Username: 
Password: 
Restrict session to IP 

Couple of Thoughts

1 2 3
Global Rank: 3279
Totalscore: 6328
Posts: 4
Thanks: 8
UpVotes: 3
Registered: 15y 299d
The User is Offline
Couple of Thoughts
Google/translate2Thank You!1Good Post!1Bad Post! link
Is there any way you could allow the user to arrange their own 'Linked sites' list?

Even if it defaults to the order they are displayed on the main page.

Right now they seem to add randomly to the existing list.

My OCD is taking a toll here. I can't seem to find a way to do this. >.<

Please? Smile
Global Rank: 73
Totalscore: 213029
Posts: 148
Thanks: 206
UpVotes: 108
Registered: 16y 289d
Kender`s Avatar



Last Seen: 2y 260d
The User is Offline
Couple of Thoughts
Google/translate2Thank You!1Good Post!1Bad Post! link
They are ordered by the date you linked them. So the first site you linked to is on top and the latest one on the bottom.

There are many ways to sort that table, but by site name would probably be best.
Making that table sortable by users is likely not worth the effort.

I've changed the order to be sorted by site name now.
Should make it easier to find the row you're looking for.
Global Rank: 3279
Totalscore: 6328
Posts: 4
Thanks: 8
UpVotes: 3
Registered: 15y 299d
The User is Offline
Couple of Thoughts
Google/translate2Thank You!1Good Post!1Bad Post! link
Thank you!! ^.^

Edit:
I think because I added them all at once the date was mixing the order up. *shrug*
Last edited by Gomaling - Feb 17, 2009 - 11:31:10
Global Rank: 347
Totalscore: 67812
Posts: 32
Thanks: 30
UpVotes: 14
Registered: 15y 316d



Last Seen: 3y 361d
The User is Offline
Couple of Thoughts
Google/translate2Thank You!0Good Post!2Bad Post! link
I'm good thanks Drool

Is some kind of mean scoring not a better system?
Global Rank: 73
Totalscore: 213029
Posts: 148
Thanks: 206
UpVotes: 108
Registered: 16y 289d
Kender`s Avatar



Last Seen: 2y 260d
The User is Offline
Couple of Thoughts
Google/translate2Thank You!1Good Post!1Bad Post! link
Quote from Degenerate

Is some kind of mean scoring not a better system?

I'm not sure what you mean by that.
A better system for ordering the Linked Sites list, or a better system for the global ranking?
Global Rank: 347
Totalscore: 67812
Posts: 32
Thanks: 30
UpVotes: 14
Registered: 15y 316d



Last Seen: 3y 361d
The User is Offline
Couple of Thoughts
Google/translate2Thank You!1Good Post!1Bad Post! link
Sorry for not giving much detail on what I was meaning,

I meant for the country ranking, would a mean (of some sorts) not be a better rank of a country than a points total.

Otherwise numbers > all

at the same time, a mean fails because numbers of 0 pointers can drop the mean.

So some sort of middle ground perhaps.
Global Rank: 73
Totalscore: 213029
Posts: 148
Thanks: 206
UpVotes: 108
Registered: 16y 289d
Kender`s Avatar



Last Seen: 2y 260d
The User is Offline
Couple of Thoughts
Google/translate2Thank You!1Good Post!1Bad Post! link
Heh, I'm still not sure what you mean Smile

The country ranking is already sortable by Score, Players and Average score by clicking on the column titles.
Or are you arguing that the default sorting should be by Average?
To be honest I like to think that sorting by Totalscore will encourage users to recruit more people to WeChall to help push their country to the top of the ranking Smile


Edit: removed wording that may have made it seem like I have something against French people
Last edited by Kender - Feb 19, 2009 - 07:34:47
Global Rank: 7
Totalscore: 498198
Posts: 67
Thanks: 89
UpVotes: 68
Registered: 16y 273d
lordOric`s Avatar













Last Seen: 224d 12h
The User is Offline
Couple of Thoughts
Google/translate2Thank You!1Good Post!1Bad Post! link
Think about it : about 60 million French have not yet registered. Drool
Global Rank: 347
Totalscore: 67812
Posts: 32
Thanks: 30
UpVotes: 14
Registered: 15y 316d



Last Seen: 3y 361d
The User is Offline
Couple of Thoughts
Google/translate2Thank You!1Good Post!1Bad Post! link
Fair enough Kender, I hadn't realised you could change sorting. It isn't something that really matters much anyway although in my opinion average would be the best default.

There are innacuracies in the way you rank regardless, or at least validity of a position can be disputed, because you can arrive at the same rank in very different ways, but I don't see this as being a huge problem, I wouldn't expect countries to get incredibly competitive over it all.
1 2 3
Kender, tunelko, quangntenemy, TheHiveMind, Z, balicocat, Ge0, samuraiblanco, arraez, jcquinterov, hophuocthinh, alfamen2, burhanudinn123, Ben_Dover, stephanduran89, braddie0, SwolloW, dangarbri, csuquvq have subscribed to this thread and receive emails on new posts.
1 people are watching the thread at the moment.
This thread has been viewed 17629 times.